PropFirmQuiz
HomeCompareFunded Futures Network (FFN) vs Topstep

Funded Futures Network (FFN) vs Topstep

A straight, no-byline futures head-to-head — cost tier, drawdown, payouts and Trustpilot, side by side. Some links are affiliate (labeled below); a listing here doesn’t buy a better verdict.

Funded Futures Network (FFN) logoFunded Futures Network (FFN)
★ 4.1 Trustpilot
vs
Topstep logoTopstep
★ 3.6 Trustpilot
Funded Futures Network (FFN)Topstep
Trustpilot★ 4.1 Trustpilot★ 3.6 Trustpilot
Cost tierbudgetmid
Account sizes$25K, $50K, $100K, $150K, $250K$50K, $100K, $150K
Drawdown typeEOD trailing (no daily loss limit)Trailing intraday
Profit split80% → 90% (live, after $5K cumulative paid)90%
Payout frequencySame-day (every 3 days, min $500)On request
Min payout$125
Days to payout5 winning days · 1–3 day processing
Rules to watch40% consistency rule on Standard evaluations, $126/mo data fee deducted from funded-account profits, Scaling is via multiple accounts, not single-account scalingTrailing intraday drawdown is unforgiving, No $25K option, 50% consistency rule
Which should you pick?
Funded Futures Network (FFN) carries the stronger Trustpilot score (4.1 vs 3.6) at build time. If entry cost is the deciding factor, Funded Futures Network (FFN) sits in the lighter Budget tier. On profit split they differ (80% → 90% (live, after $5K cumulative paid) vs 90%) — check which kicks in at your scaling stage. Both cleared our vetting and both trade futures, so the honest answer is "it depends" — on your market, your rule tolerance, and which checkout screen makes you wince less. Links below go straight to live pricing.

Specs from each firm’s checkout (our ground truth) and public pages: Funded Futures Network (FFN), Topstep. Trustpilot scores are third-party, captured at build time. Affiliate links are labeled; they don’t change the verdict.

Full Funded Futures Network (FFN) review →Full Topstep review →