PropFirmQuiz
HomeCompareFundedNext vs Lucid Trading

FundedNext vs Lucid Trading

A straight, no-byline futures head-to-head — cost tier, drawdown, payouts and Trustpilot, side by side. Some links are affiliate (labeled below); a listing here doesn’t buy a better verdict.

FundedNext logoFundedNext
★ 4.5 Trustpilot
vs
Lucid Trading logoLucid Trading
★ 4.6 Trustpilot
FundedNextLucid Trading
Trustpilot★ 4.5 Trustpilot★ 4.6 Trustpilot
Cost tierbudgetbudget
Account sizes$25K, $50K, $100K, $150K, $200K$25K, $50K, $100K, $150K
Drawdown typeMax overall + daily (by model)EOD trailing (locks at start)
Profit splitUp to 90% (100% some models)90/10 (100% first $10K on Pro)
Payout frequencyBi-weekly · fee refunded at first payoutDaily · ~15-min processing
Min payout$250 (25K/50K) · $500 (100K)$500
Days to payoutCycle-based: 5–21 days first · 24h5 winning days/cycle · ~2-day payout
Rules to watchNews profit-split rule (40% tier-1), Bolt model has 5-payout lifecycle~40% funded consistency rule (Pro), Payout caps per cycle, Newer firm (founded 2025), EOD drawdown only
Which should you pick?
On profit split they differ (Up to 90% (100% some models) vs 90/10 (100% first $10K on Pro)) — check which kicks in at your scaling stage. Both cleared our vetting and both trade futures, so the honest answer is "it depends" — on your market, your rule tolerance, and which checkout screen makes you wince less. Links below go straight to live pricing.
Discount applies through the link — no code needed→ see live pricing at checkout
Permanent verified 40% off evaluationsVIBES→ see live pricing at checkout

Specs from each firm’s checkout (our ground truth) and public pages: FundedNext (affiliate), Lucid Trading. Trustpilot scores are third-party, captured at build time. Affiliate links are labeled; they don’t change the verdict.

Full FundedNext review →Full Lucid Trading review →