PropFirmQuiz
HomeCompareFundedNext vs Topstep

FundedNext vs Topstep

A straight, no-byline futures head-to-head — cost tier, drawdown, payouts and Trustpilot, side by side. Some links are affiliate (labeled below); a listing here doesn’t buy a better verdict.

FundedNext logoFundedNext
★ 4.5 Trustpilot
vs
Topstep logoTopstep
★ 3.6 Trustpilot
FundedNextTopstep
Trustpilot★ 4.5 Trustpilot★ 3.6 Trustpilot
Cost tierbudgetmid
Account sizes$25K, $50K, $100K, $150K, $200K$50K, $100K, $150K
Drawdown typeMax overall + daily (by model)Trailing intraday
Profit splitUp to 90% (100% some models)90%
Payout frequencyBi-weekly · fee refunded at first payoutOn request
Min payout$250 (25K/50K) · $500 (100K)$125
Days to payoutCycle-based: 5–21 days first · 24h5 winning days · 1–3 day processing
Rules to watchNews profit-split rule (40% tier-1), Bolt model has 5-payout lifecycleTrailing intraday drawdown is unforgiving, No $25K option, 50% consistency rule
Which should you pick?
FundedNext carries the stronger Trustpilot score (4.5 vs 3.6) at build time. If entry cost is the deciding factor, FundedNext sits in the lighter Budget tier. On profit split they differ (Up to 90% (100% some models) vs 90%) — check which kicks in at your scaling stage. Both cleared our vetting and both trade futures, so the honest answer is "it depends" — on your market, your rule tolerance, and which checkout screen makes you wince less. Links below go straight to live pricing.
Discount applies through the link — no code needed→ see live pricing at checkout

Specs from each firm’s checkout (our ground truth) and public pages: FundedNext (affiliate), Topstep. Trustpilot scores are third-party, captured at build time. Affiliate links are labeled; they don’t change the verdict.

Full FundedNext review →Full Topstep review →